The Committees
The new committees were set up by the Parliament on 4 June 2003 . They quickly got into their stride. By 11 June all committees had met and chosen conveners and deputy conveners.
There are two main types of committee: mandatory ones required by the Standing Orders (rules governing the way the Parliament works); and subject committees. The new subject committees cover the same range of topics as the previous committees. However, there have been a few changes to individual responsibilities. For example, transport is dealt with by a new Local Government and Transport Committee and the environment comes under the remit of the new Environment and Rural Development Committee. Culture is the responsibility of the new Enterprise and Culture Committee.
Did You Know?
Mandatory committees must be set up after each election. They have fixed roles and responsibilities. Examples of mandatory committees includethe Finance Committee and the Equal Opportunities Committee. Subject committees examine particularareas of government such as health and education.Unlike mandatory committees, the number ofsubject committees and their roles andresponsibilities may vary from one session to the next. |
During the year, there were 417 committee meetings lasting nearly 825 hours. The committee considered 18 bills and carried out 34 inquiries. The committees continue to work in partnership with the public. They heard from a total of 1,446 witnesses representing 587 organisations this year. The pages that follow give a flavour of the work of each committee and their membership at the end of this session. More details can be found in individual committee annual reports. These are published on the committee pages of the website. Details of each committee's remit, membership changes, public papers of committee meetings and agendas can also be found there.
The committees in this session picked up where they left off in the last. They remain committed to working in partnership with the people and they continue to scrutinise the Executive in a thorough but fair manner.
Audit Committee
Convener:
Mr Brian Monteith
Members:
Rhona Brankin
Susan Deacon
Robin Harper
Margaret Jamieson
George Lyon
Mr Kenny MacAskill
Remit
The Audit Committee holds to account public sector bodies that spend taxpayers’ money. It does this by examining financial documents put before, or reports made to, the Parliament. These public sector bodies include:
• Scottish Executive departments;
• Executive agencies;
• Non-departmental public bodies;
• NHS boards and trusts;
• Further education colleges; and
• Water authorities.
Report
The Audit Committee makes sure public money is spent wisely. It does this by holding inquiries into subjects raised in reports by the Auditor General for Scotland. The past year was the committee’s busiest. The committee took evidence on more reports of the Auditor General than ever before.
The committee’s inquiries included an examination of the Individual Learning Accounts Scheme. The inquiry found that the scheme, which aimed to encourage adults back into further education, was fundamentally flawed.
The committee looked also at the prescribing of drugs by GPs. It concluded that more could be done to reduce waste and improve patient services. The committee published a report on the Scottish Further Education Funding Council (SFEFC). It found that the SFEFC needed to do more to fulfil promises set out in earlier committee reports.
The committee took evidence on Scottish Enterprise, the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body’s accounts and the Auditor General’s overview report on the NHS in Scotland.
Evidence was taken by the committee from representatives of the Accounts Commission for the first time. This was in recognition of the increasing number of reports published jointly by the Auditor General for Scotland and the Accounts Commission.
Finally, the committee continued to build links between other UK parliaments and assemblies by visiting the National Assembly for Wales.
Communities Committee
Convener:
Johann Lamont
Members:
Scott Barrie
Cathie Craigie
Donald Gorrie
Patrick Harvie
Campbell Martin (until 31 March 2004 )
Mary Scanlon
Elaine Smith
Stewart Stevenson
Ms Sandra White
Remit
The Communities Committee considers a wide range of issues including:
. Antisocial behaviour;
. Housing and area regeneration;
. Poverty;
. The voluntary sector;
. Charity law; and
. Planning and building standards.
Report
The main focus for the committee this year was the Antisocial Behaviour etc. ( Scotland ) Bill. The committee thought it important to talk to local communities about their experiences of antisocial behaviour. members visited Lossiemouth, Dundee, Stirling, Dumfries, Alexandria, East Kilbride, Edinburgh, Pollokshields and Royston to gather evidence before the bill was introduced. The committee also published a questionnaire on its web page. More than 100 people responded with their views on the issue. Wide-ranging oral and written evidence was considered before the committee agreed to the general principles of the bill.
The committee also looked at the Fire Sprinklers in Residential Premises ( Scotland ) Bill at Stage 1. This is a member's bill which proposes that fire sprinklers are installed in certain types of residential properties that are considered to be at particular risk. After taking evidence, the committee welcomed a commitment by the Scottish Executive to make sprinkler systems compulsory in specific types of residential properties built in the future.
Other work carried out by the committee included the consideration and agreement of draft debt arrangement regulations. These introduce a system which will allow people to repay multiple debts with regular payments.
Education Committee
Convener:
Robert Brown
Members:
Ms Wendy Alexander
Rhona Brankin
Ms Rosemary Byrne
Lord James
Douglas-Hamilton
Fiona Hyslop
Mr Adam Ingram
Mr Kenneth Macintosh
Dr Elaine Murray
Remit
. Pre-school and school education;
. Children's services;
. Social work;
. Young people; and
. Gaelic.
Report
The committee agreed that one of its most important functions was to examine the work of the Scottish Executive.
Before publishing a report on the Additional Support for Learning ( Scotland ) Bill, members visited schools across Scotland and met with parents of children who received learning support. The views of children, young people and parents were also sought at public events and through focus groups. More than 90 organisations gave written evidence and oral evidence was taken from 52 witnesses during seven committee meetings.
Following the Stage 3 debate on 1 April 2004 the bill was passed by the Parliament.
Committee members were concerned about reports published by the Scottish Executive and Edinburgh City Council on failures in social work departments. They agreed to carry out an inquiry into child protection. The inquiry focuses on progress made in implementing Scottish Executive recommendations outlined in its report, It's everyone's job to make sure I'm alright.
Written and oral evidence is currently being taken for the inquiry. It is planned to publish a report in June.
The committee met and established links with youth groups and the Scottish Youth Parliament. The committee also hosted a visit from members of the Norwegian Parliament.
Enterprise and Culture Committee
Convener:
Alasdair Morgan
Members:
Brian Adam
Chris Ballance
Susan Deacon
Murdo Fraser
Christine May
Mr Jamie Stone
Mike Watson
Richard Baker
Remit
The Enterprise and Culture Committee remit includes:
. Enterprise ;
. Arts and culture;
. Lifelong learning (further and higher education but excluding school education);
. Sport;
. Tourism; and
. Renewable energy.
Report
The committee started the year by assessing the impact on Scottish universities of the introduction of variable tuition fees in England . Members sought the views of business and academic leaders before concluding that a substantial amount of extra money is needed from the Executive if Scottish universities are to remain competitive. Copies of the report, Scottish Solutions , were circulated to all Westminster MPs with Scottish constituencies.
Scotland has the best renewable energy resources in Europe . The committee's second major inquiry this year focused on harnessing those resources to benefit the nation. The committee visited the Vestas-Celtic wind turbine factory in Campbeltown. As the Kintyre peninsula's biggest employer, the plant provides work for more than 200 people. Members visited a wind farm and spoke to 60 local people about how wind energy affects their lives. Committee members also travelled to Denmark to learn about renewable energy. Overall, more than 150 individuals and organisations contributed to the inquiry.
The committee continues to monitor progress on previous work. For example, it has begun a short inquiry into broadband internet access in Scotland . It will look at whether or not the Executive's targets for coverage are being met and the future benefits of broadband.
Environment and Rural Development Committee
Convener:
Sarah Boyack
Members:
Roseanna Cunningham
Rob Gibson
Karen Gillon
Alex Johnstone
Maureen Macmillan
Mr Alasdair Morrison
Nora Radcliffe
Eleanor Scott
Remit
To consider and report on rural development, the environment and natural heritage, agriculture and fisheries and any other issues, which are the responsibility of the Minister for Environment and Rural Development.
Report
The committee met 28 times in this parliamentary year and undertook a wide range of work.
It carried out an inquiry into the Scottish Executive's National Waste Plan. Following the Executive's response to the committee's report on the inquiry, a parliamentary debate was held in January 2004.
Members reported to the Finance Committee on the draft Scottish Executive budget for 2004-05 and made recommendations to improve the information given by the Executive during this process.
The committee conducted an inquiry into the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. It also examined the Scottish Executive budget for 2005-06. The committee was due to produce a Stage 1 report on the spending plans and publish a report on its inquiry in May 2004.
Members looked at the Nature Conservation ( Scotland ) Bill, which aims to protect wildlife and Scotland 's landscape as well as conserving biodiversity. Committee members went on four fact-finding visits to weigh up the likely impact of the bill.
The committee dealt with subordinate legislation and petitions covering a wide range of topics. It also heard evidence from Scottish ministers on their priorities for the current presidency of the European Union.
The committee also commissioned external research to analyse how sustainable development is delivered in Scotland and elsewhere.
Did You Know?
Biological diversity - or biodiversity - is the term given to the variety of life on Earth and the natural patterns it forms. The biodiversity we see today is the fruit of billions of years of evolution, shaped by natural processes and, increasingly, by the influence of humans. It forms the web of life of which we are an integral part and upon which we so fully depend. |
Equal Opportunities Committee
Members:
Cathy Peattie
Members:
Shiona Baird
Frances Curran
Marlyn Glen
Marilyn Livingstone
Campbell Martin (until 31 March 2004 )
Mrs Nanette Milne
Elaine Smith
Margaret Smith
Ms Sandra White
Remit
The Equal Opportunities Committee considers and reports on equal opportunities both within the Parliament and Scotland as a whole.
Report
The committee met with a wide range of people involved in equal opportunities issues. It took evidence on proposals for UK legislation which would allow transsexual people to be legally recognised in their acquired gender. It also took evidence on UK legislation which would allow samesex partners to register their partnerships and gain legally recognised rights and responsibilities.
One key area of activity was the committee's investigation into the achievements and lessons of the 2003 European Year of Disabled People. It also looked at issues affecting disabled people in Scotland in general. As well as asking for written evidence, the committee met in Glasgow to listen to views of disabled people and carers for its forthcoming disability inquiry.
A well attended event, it was made up of a formal evidence session, an informal meeting with families and young people affected by disability and an open session during which participants were able to express their views on issues affecting disabled people in Scotland.
Informal meetings were also organised in Inverness and Fife to allow groups to talk over issues with the committee's disabilityreporter. The committee later took evidence from the Minister for Communities and will consider all of this information when launching its inquiry in summer 2004. Annual Report 2003 to 2004
European and External Relations Committee
Members:
Richard Lochhead
Members:
Dennis Canavan
Mrs Margaret Ewing
Phil Gallie
Mr John Home Robertson
Gordon Jackson
Mr Alasdair Morrison
Irene Oldfather
Mr Keith Raffan
Remit
The remit of the European and External Relations Committee is to consider and report on:
. Draft EU legislation and its implementation;
. Wider EU issues; and
. The development and implementation of the Scottish Executive's external relations strategy and activities.
Report
The committee hit the ground running with the launch of three new inquiries.
The first deals with changes to European Union regional policy and what this will mean for Scotland . With hundreds of millions of pounds at stake, this is a very important matter.
The second inquiry is about how the Scottish Executive promotes our country worldwide through trade, tourism, culture and sports, including the Fresh Talent initiative, a scheme to encourage people from other countries to live and work in Scotland.
The final inquiry looks at how low-cost airlines in Scotland will be affected by the recent EC decision, which resulted in Ryanair reviewing its service to Charleroi airport in Belgium.
The committee continues to look at the EU's proposed constitution. Members were pleased to take evidence from Dr Denis MacShane MP, Minister of State in the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office ( 7 January 2004 ).
The committee also raised the profile of EU issues within the Parliament by sponsoring two debates in the Chamber, one celebrating the EU's enlargement.
In March 2004, members attended the first formal meeting of the Network of Regional Parliamentary European Committees in the Catalan Parliament. They continue to forge links with sister committees across the UK 's parliaments and assemblies.
Finally, members carry on the tradition of welcoming visitors to the Scottish Parliament. Members were honoured to meet visitors as diverse as the Italian and Irish ambassadors and the governor of Colorado in the United States .
Finance Committee
Members:
Des McNulty
Members:
Ms Wendy Alexander
Mr Ted Brocklebank
Fergus Ewing
Kate Maclean
Jim Mather
Dr Elaine Murray
Jeremy Purvis
John Swinburne
Remit
To consider and report on any proposals for public spending from the Scottish budget.
Report
As well as considering the 2004-05 budget and the financial implications of 14 bills, the committee carried out two major investigations in the past year.
After concerns were raised in committee about Scottish Water charges, members agreed to appoint Jim Mather and Jeremy Purvis to investigate. As well as considering written evidence, the committee took oral evidence from Scottish Water, the Water Industry Commissioner, Analytical Consulting Limited and the Deputy Minister for Environment and Rural Affairs. The committee's report was published on 23 April 2004 .
The committee also appointed Dr Elaine Murray and Fergus Ewing as reporters to look at the Scottish Executive's policy on relocating public sector jobs. The investigation followed a petition about proposals to move Scottish NaturalHeritage's headquarters from Edinburgh to Inverness . After taking oral evidence from the Deputy Minister for Finance and Public Services, the committee agreed to widen this investigation into an inquiry. As part of its inquiry, the committee met several relevant agencies and non departmental public bodies (NDPBs). Reporters also visited Dublin to learn more about decentralisation in Ireland . In addition, a questionnaire was posted on the committee's web page. Public sector staff members were invited to fill it in, outlining their experiences of relocation. The committee is expected to publish its report in June 2004.
Health Committee
Convener:
Christine Grahame
Members:
Mr David Davidson
Helen Eadie
Janis Hughes
Kate Maclean
Mr Duncan McNeil
Shona Robison
Mike Rumbles
Dr Jean Turner
Remit
. Health; and
. Community care.
Report
The Health Committee started the new session with a day outwith the Parliament, which included a successful public meeting in Loch Melfort, Argyll. This gave members the chance to hear local people's views on health matters. The committee also considered its work programme for the future, agreeing to hold an inquiry into staffing in the NHS. Following this inquiry, the committee will look at community care.
The committee's busy legislative schedule took up much of its time. It considered the Primary Medical Services ( Scotland ) Bill and the National Health Service Reform ( Scotland ) Bill. The committee also sought evidence on two member's bills: the Breastfeeding etc. ( Scotland ) Bill and the Prohibition of Smoking in Regulated Areas ( Scotland ) Bill.
Despite the heavy legislative workload, the committee managed to consider 26 petitions and 110 items of subordinate legislation, more than any other subject committee. The committee also considered the Executive's 2004-05 spending plans. The committee and its adviser are in talks with the Executive about improving the supply of information about the £7,831 million health budget for 2005-06.
Justice 1 Committee
Convener:
Pauline McNeill
Members:
Bill Butler
Marlyn Glen
Michael Matheson
Margaret Mitchell
Mr Stewart Maxwell
Margaret Smith
Remit
The Justice 1 Committee considers and reports on the civil and criminal justice systems, reform of civil and criminal laws and other issues that are the responsibility of the Minister for Justice. It also considers some functions of the Lord Advocate.
Report
The Justice 1 Committee plays an important role looking at the justice system. It concluded a detailed scrutiny of the way the High Court works. The aim is to ensure people involved in criminal hearings know what is going on. Other subjects such as revealing evidence early were also examined. People involved in criminal law, such as solicitors, gave their views during a seminar on the bill hosted by the committee. The committee also sponsored a debate in the Chamber on alternatives to prison sentences, which focused on community penalties.
In terms of civil law, the committee considered the European Commission's green paper (a draft proposal) on settling disputes and its potential impact on domestic law. A video-conference with the lead official in Brussels helped the committee respond to the green paper.
Additionally, the committee launched an inquiry into how well prison rehabilitation programmes work. It also started to examine the first committee bill in the Parliament to become law (the Protection from Abuse ( Scotland ) Act 2001), to see if it is effective. The committee visited several prisons and courts across Scotland to meet and listen to the people who are affected by changes to the justice system.
Issues raised by the public through letters and petitions, including security of tenure and rights of access for hutters, dangerous driving and miscarriages of justice, were investigated by the committee.
Justice 2 Committee
Convener:
Miss Annabel Goldie
Members:
Jackie Baillie
Colin Fox
Maureen Macmillan
Mike Pringle
Nicola Sturgeon
Karen Whitefield
Remit
The Justice 2 Committee considers and reports on the civil and criminal justice systems, the reform of civil and criminal laws and other issues that are the responsibility of the Minister for Justice. It also considers some functions of the Lord Advocate.
Report
The Justice 2 Committee, with the Justice 1 Committee, plays a principal role in scrutinising the justice system.
This year, members finished a detailed investigation of a draft law to provide better protection and assistance to vulnerable witnesses giving evidence in court (the Vulnerable Witnesses ( Scotland ) Bill). They heard from many organisations and individuals, including those who had given or were due to give evidence in court. The committee also considered evidence on the Antisocial Behaviour ( Scotland ) Bill. The committee focused on how well the new powers would work and how they would impact on the current justice system. The findings of the Justice 2 Committee were reported to the Communities Committee.
The committee started taking evidence on plans for a UK Supreme Court and how it will affect Scotland . Parliamentary history was made when the Lord President came before the committee to give evidence. Members also began a review of an act passed in the first Parliament, the Adults with Incapacity ( Scotland ) Act. Initial evidence was taken which will help the committee decide whether or not to go ahead with a review.
The committee started to look at the Tenements ( Scotland ) Bill. The bill is the final part of a package of reforms dealing with land ownership.
Additionally, the committee hosted a seminar on youth justice to help with its forthcoming inquiry into the issue.
The committee visited prisons and courts across Scotland to meet and listen to people affected by changes to the justice system.
Issues raised by the public through letters and petitions, such as the shoeing of Clydesdale horses, the Scottish Legal Aid Board, the welfare of minors and complainers' rights were investigated by the committee.
Local Government and Transport Committee
Convener:
Bristow Muldoon
Members:
Dr Sylvia Jackson
Michael McMahon
Mr Bruce McFee
Paul Martin
David Mundell
Tommy Sheridan
Iain Smith
Mr Andrew Welsh
Remit
The Local Government and Transport Committee looks at local government issues, which fall within the responsibility of the Minister for Finance and Public Services; and transport issues, which are part of the remit of the Minister for Transport.
Report
The committee had a busy year. It looked at the Local Governance ( Scotland ) Bill, the Prostitution Tolerance Zones ( Scotland ) Bill and the Antisocial Behaviour etc. ( Scotland ) Bill. It has also held a mini inquiry into the rail industry in Scotland .
Much of the committee's time was given over to the Local Governance ( Scotland ) Bill. Among other aims, the bill seeks to introduce the single transferable vote (STV) for local government elections in Scotland . This will give people the chance to vote for as many candidates as they like, in order of preference. Once election quotas are reached by candidates, their surplus votes are redistributed to second and subsequent choice candidates. The committee agreed to recommend that the Parliament approve its general principles. It is expected to begin Stage 2 scrutiny later in the year.
The committee's consideration of the bill was preceded by visits to Dublin and Belfast where, in both cases, STV is already in use. The visits proved informative. During debates, members drew regularly on knowledge gained in Dublin and Belfast .
In July 2003, the Strategic Rail Authority announced it was to consult on its future strategy for railway maintenance and improvement. The Minister for Transport has also identified a number of important rail projects in Scotland , such as the re-development of Waverley Station in Edinburgh and rail links to Glasgow and Edinburgh airports. The committee agreed to hold a mini inquiry on the rail industry in Scotland and took evidence from the Strategic Rail Authority and Network Rail.
As part of its mini inquiry, members of the committee visited the Forth Bridge to see bridge maintenance being carried out.
Procedures Committee
Convener:
Iain Smith
Members:
Mr Richard Baker
Mark Ballard
Bruce Crawford
Cathie Craigie
Karen Gillon
Mr Jamie McGrigor
Remit
The remit of the Procedures Committee is to consider and report on the practice and procedures of the Parliament in relation to its business. This involves, in particular, recommending changes to the Standing Orders, the Parliament's rule book.
Report
The committee began the session by launching a review of First Minister's Question Time (FMQT), which it then followed with a wider inquiry into how questions are asked orally.
Recognising the popularity of oral questions, both with the media and the public, the committee conducted an extensive investigation into how, if at all, the current system could be improved. In addition to giving a questionnaire to people watching FMQT and Question Time (QT) from the public gallery, the committee, with the support of the Parliament's ParticipationServices team, invited six community groups from across Scotland to visit the Parliament. Those invited then watched FMQT and QT and gave their views to the committee.
The committee thought that extending FMQT from 20 to 30 minutes and separating it from Question Time would give MSPs more chances to quiz ministers and hold them to account. The committee also recommended the introduction of a new thematic element to Question Time, with the focus on different ministers each week. Question Time was also extended from 40 to 60 minutes. These changes began on a trial basis, with a final review to be conducted before the summer.
The committee's two other major inquiries were about the way laws are made. Its ongoing inquiry into non-Executive bills (primarily members' bills) looks at whether a system for prioritising proposals for members' bills is needed. The committee has also begun an in-depth inquiry into how long it takes bills to pass through the 3-stage process of parliamentary scrutiny. The committee asked for evidence from all those with an interest in the process and will report to the Parliament with its findings.
During this year, the committee also considered and made recommendations about emergency bill procedures and the temporary suspension of the Parliament's Standing Orders.
Finally, the committee updated and re-issued the Parliament's rulebook, the Standing Orders.
Public Petitions Committee
Convener:
Michael McMahon
Members:
Jackie Baillie
Helen Eadie
Linda Fabiani
Carolyn Leckie
Campbell Martin
John Farquhar Munro
John Scott
Mike Watson
Ms Sandra White (until 31 March 2004)
Remit
The Public Petitions Committee looks at public petitions and decides what action should be taken.
Report
The Public Petitions Committee is widely regarded as one of the Scottish Parliament's successstories in terms of encouraging people to get involved in politics. It continues to give individuals, community and pressure groups a chance to influence the Scottish Parliament.
On 27 November 2003 , the committee, under the leadership of John McAllion MSP and Michael McMahon MSP, won the Committee of the Year Award 2003 at the prestigious Scottish Politician of the Year Awards.
Petitions considered
During the period of this report the committee considered 114 new petitions, covering a wide range of topics.
Many of these petitions were examined when considering bills, including the Vulnerable Witnesses ( Scotland ) Bill and the Education (Additional Support for Learning) ( Scotland ) Bill. Some were part of other committees' inquiries into subjects such as renewable energy, broadband technology, Scottish football and the European Year of Disabled People 2003.
Many petitions resulted in positive changes. For example, Historic Scotland improved guidance on grant applications after this was raised by the committee. The Scottish Executive promises that its forthcoming planning bill will include new rules about repeat planning applications thanks to the committee's concerns.
e-petitioning
The Scottish Parliament is known throughout the world for encouraging modern, new ways to petition through its e-petitioner system. The first of its kind, the system allows signatures to be gathered via the Internet. Each e-petition has its own forum where visitors and signatories can discuss the petition and surrounding issues online. Following the success of a two-year pilot project with the International Teledemocracy Centre at Napier University , the e-petitioner system went live in October 2003 and was formally launched in February 2004.
Equality issues
Members backed the Equal Opportunities Committee guidelines on equal opportunities in the Parliament's committees. It introduced an equal opportunities monitoring form, which all petitioners will be requested to complete when submitting a petition.
The committee published revised guidance on submitting petitions in the following languages: English; Arabic; Bengali; Cantonese; Gaelic; Punjabi; and Urdu. Braille and audio versions are also now available.
Standards Committee
Convener:
Brian Adam
Members:
Bill Butler
Alex Fergusson
Donald Gorrie
Mr Kenneth Macintosh
Alex Neil
Karen Whitefield
Remit
The Standards Committee is responsible for:
. Issues relating to the conductof MSPs in carrying out their Parliamentary duties;
. The Register of Members' Interests; and
. The Parliament's Code of Conduct for MSPs.
Report
The Standards Committee started work on new legislation on members' interests. The committee's challenge will be to ensure that any proposal meets the Parliament's obligation to be open and accountable to the Scottish people. The committee aims to introduce a bill in late 2004.
The committee is also responsible for overseeing the Cross-Party Groups (CPGs) in the Parliament. There are now 47 of these groups covering issues as diverse as the Scottish contemporary music industry and affordable housing. Many of them were set up in the first parliamentary session, which shows that CPGs deal with issues of real interest to both MSPs and the wider community. The Standards Committee will make sure the system continues to act as an important link between the Parliament and the public.
The committee intends to keep both the Code of Conduct and the way complaints are handled under review to ensure that they work well.
With the help of the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, Dr Jim Dyer OBE, the committee will check how the complaints process works. Where necessary, it will think about changing procedures to ensure that the public and MSPs are confident that complaints are being heard and taken seriously.
The committee continues to work with other parliaments and assemblies to improve standards in public life. In March 2004, following a request from the Standards of Conduct Committee at the National Assembly for Wales , the committee submitted written evidence on the complaints system of the Scottish Parliament.
Subordinate Legislation Committee
Convener:
Dr Sylvia Jackson
Members:
Gordon Jackson
Mr Stewart Maxwell
Christine May
Alasdair Morgan
Mike Pringle
Murray Tosh
Remit
The committee examines the legal soundness and the technical drafting of legislation made by the Executive under Acts of Parliament and considers new powers to make secondary legislation contained in parliamentary bills. It can also inquire into the general questions about powers to make subordinate legislation.
Did You Know?
Subordinate legislation is the law made by a person or organisation, for example Scottish ministers, under powers granted to them by Acts of Parliament. Some examples of subordinate legislation are regulations, orders and local authority bye-laws. |
Report
The committee has met weekly since its first meeting on 10 June 2003 . It works to tight timescales, publishing at least one report each week. It also reports on delegated powers in bills. The committee considers bills put forward by the Executive, MSPs and committees.
On 27 January, the committee agreed to launch a two-part inquiry into regulations in Scotland and plans for a statutory instruments bill. Statutory instruments are rules about how governments use powers. Each part is expected to last about a year, which would allow a further year for the passage of a statutory instruments bill before the end of this parliamentary session. The committee appointed an adviser, held its first evidence-taking session with witnesses and received written submissions. A committee delegation visited Westminster to meet a number of parliamentary scrutiny committees and held a seminar with members of the Regulatory Impact Unit and the Better Regulation Task Force in the Cabinet Office.
Between its regular scrutiny work and the inquiry, the committee looks forward to a very full session, which could well have a long-term impact on the way laws are made in Scotland .
Private Bills Committees
Stirling - Alloa - Kincardine Railway and Linked Improvements Bill Committee
Convener:
Bill Butler
Members:
Richard Baker
Rob Gibson
David Mundell
Nora Radcliffe
Waverley Railway ( Scotland ) Bill Committee
Convener:
Tricia Marwick
Members:
Mr Ted Brocklebank
Gordon Jackson
Christine May
Margaret Smith
The Private Bills Unit was set up in July 2003 because of the number of transport and works private bills expected this session. Private bills allow a promoter to have powers or benefits in addition to, or in conflict with, the general law.
The Robin Rigg Offshore Wind Farm (Navigation and Fishing) (Scotland) Act 2003 received Royal Assent on 1 August 2003, giving the promoter authority to interfere with navigation rights and fishing in order to build and maintain a wind farm in the Solway Firth.
The Stirling-Alloa-Kincardine Railway and Linked Improvements Bill was introduced on 15 May 2003 . A total of 55 admissible objections were received. The Stirling-Alloa-Kincardine Railway and Linked Improvements Bill Committee held three meetings in Alloa to hear evidence at preliminary stage and, following its report, the Parliament agreed the general principles of the bill on 11 December 2003 . The committee then considered written submissions and took oral evidence from the bill promoter and objectors at consideration stage.
The Waverley Railway ( Scotland ) Bill was introduced on 11 September 2003 . Its main purpose is to authorise reconstruction of a railway from Edinburgh to Tweedbank in the Scottish Borders. A total of 118 admissible objections were received. The Waverley Railway ( Scotland ) Bill Committee was set up to scrutinise the bill.
Two bills about building tram lines in Edinburgh were introduced on 29 January 2004 . A total of 197 and 82 admissible objections were received for the Line 1 and Line 2 Bills respectively. |